Saturday, May 11, 2013

2012: Florida "Orlando" hub of Mexican drug cartel Orlando Sentinel April 12

Feds: Mexican drug ring made Central Florida marijuana distribution hub

5:08 p.m. EST, April 4, 2012|By Amy Pavuk, Orlando Sentinel
Mexican drug cartels, responsible for widespread violence and more than 40,000 deaths in that country, operate all across the U.S. — and Central Florida is no exception.
For the past three years, federal agents say, associates of the Gulf Cartel trucked in thousands of pounds of marijuana to Apopka and other Orlando communities — establishing the area as a distribution hub.
They buried millions of dollars on properties in Central Florida. They stashed assault rifles and ballistic vests in Apopka. They stored their drugs in open areas such as garden nurseries.
All the while, their drug trade brought in millions of dollars.
Nine suspected members of the Central Florida ring were recently charged by federal prosecutors in Orlando as part of a complex investigation that spanned to Texas and involved multiple federal and local law-enforcement agencies.
Investigators executed search warrants throughout Florida and in Texas, and seized more than 6,000 pounds of marijuana, more than 90 firearms and cash.
An 81-page criminal complaint filed in the case details much of the group's suspected activities, including previous interactions with law enforcement.
The case, in some ways, is a textbook example of what's happening in the American drug trade, said Ted Galen Carpenter, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and author of "The Fire Next Door: Mexico's Drug Violence and the Danger to America," which will be published in October.
"I wouldn't find this incident unusual at all," Carpenter said. "The Mexican cartels have connections with domestic trafficking gangs.
"Their tentacles are quite extensive in the United States."
In the Central Florida ring, agents say, marijuana was shipped in bulk from a trafficker in McAllen, Texas, to Panama City, then picked up and brought to Central Florida or Jacksonville for distribution.
After the marijuana was sold locally, the cash was picked up and taken back on the same route, to Panama City and then to Texas.
Once the cash made it to Panama City in the Florida Panhandle, a new load of marijuana was picked up for distribution, and the cycle continued.
Court documents detail the roles of each of the suspected Central Florida ring members. Some were organizers, some were drivers, and others were involved with offloading and delivery.
Sources told agents each shipment of marijuana produced $800,000 to $1 million in proceeds.
The group buried the cash on various properties until it was ready to be shipped back to Texas.
It may seem a risky way to store millions, but Carpenter said it's not surprising.
Unlike legal businesses, drug traffickers can't simply deposit their revenue into a bank account.
"You can't just walk into a Bank of America … and deposit $80,000 in cash," Carpenter said. "That would ring alarm bells all over the place."
This is one of the biggest challenges drug cartels have, but certainly not the only problem.
There's always the risk of getting caught — and members of this group had their run-ins with law enforcement before the ring was ultimately brought down by federal authorities in February.
In April 2011, Apopka police stopped and arrested one of the suspected members, Cesar Ramos, who had 400 pounds of marijuana in the bed of his truck, court records said.
Law enforcement investigating the Central Florida ring began surveillance on the group — in addition to working with a confidential source associated with the ring — and knew there would be a marijuana shipment Aug. 29.
That night, Apopka police stopped the driver of a semi truck on Jones Road for a traffic violation and found 2,798 pounds of marijuana hidden in a shipment of produce, reports show. The driver was arrested on state charges.
Earlier this year, law enforcement stopped Ramos again in Louisiana. He was towing a vehicle and told an officer he was hauling the car for a friend and heading to Texas.
When authorities searched the car, they found 10 packages covered in black electrical tape and a yellow spray-sealant foam inside the spare tire.
In them was nearly $50,000 in cash, court records said.
Law enforcement continued surveillance on the group, and in late January, troopers stopped one of the suspected ring members on Florida's Turnpike after he picked up marijuana that was stored in rural Osceola County.
When authorities searched his truck, they found 16 garbage bags full of marijuana, totaling 700 pounds, court records said. The driver, Jesus Gonzalez-Salcedo, was arrested.
So far, one of the nine suspects in the Central Florida ring, Ivan Alvarado, pleaded guilty in Orlando federal court. He admitted in a plea agreement to being a distributor in the ring. He faces up to life in prison and will be sentenced in June.
Mexican-based criminal organizations dominate the supply, trafficking and wholesale distribution of most illicit drugs in the U.S., according to the 2011 National Drug Threat Assessment produced by the Department of Justice.
The Gulf Cartel is one of the seven main Mexican criminal organizations that traffic drugs in the U.S., and the group is known for selling cocaine and marijuana in Florida, the mid-Atlantic, New England, New York, New Jersey, the Southeast and Southwest.
But unlike Mexico, where thousands have died because of criminal organizations such as the Gulf Cartel, the Sinaloa Cartel and La Familia, the groups in the United States appear to be less violent.
"For the most part, this is pure business," Carpenter said.
"These domestic gangs are kind of the retail outlets for the cartels and their products," Carpenter said. "So far, the violence that has so plagued Mexico and has taken close to 50,000 lives in the last five years doesn't seem to be exploding in the United States."
apavuk@tribune.com or 407-420-5735
Editor's note: An earlier version of this story included the incorrect jail photograph for Jaime Rodriguez Sandoval. The photo has been corrected.

UPDATE: Aerostat Balloons on U.S. border Market Daily Report Jan 23 2013

Barack Obama To Shut Down Southern Air Defense Systems

January 23rd, 2013
29
5314
156
obamaMac Slavo: As the U.S. government continues to expand surveillance and monitoring systems to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars within the borders of the United States, a recent announcement regarding the country’s southern air defense systems is raising eyebrows.
Our southern border is, in part, protected by the Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS), which utilizes moored balloons hovering at about 15,000 feet to identify low flying aircraft and missiles that may penetrate the border and cross into U.S. airspace.
The system is utilized by the U.S. Air Force, North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection for a number of missions including detection of drug smuggling and preservation of the air sovereignty of the continental United States.
According to Exelis Systems Corporation, the company that built and jointly maintains TARS with the U.S. Air Force, the government has ordered a complete shutdown of Aerostat flight operations:
The government also indicated its intent that aerostat flight operations will cease on March 15, 2013, and that the remainder of the fiscal year will be used to deflate aerostats, disposition equipment, and prepare sites for permanent closure. We are currently reviewing all the details of the RfP and evaluating the possible impacts on the program and our workforce. We continue to communicate with the government on this matter, and we will have more information in the coming days and weeks.
An Exelis employee close to the TARS project had this to say about the closure of the sites:
“Not only will this closure mean hundreds of people will be out of jobs, but it also means our borders will not be safe, especially along the remote U.S. Mexico Border like in Texas.
These defense radars detect low flying aircraft infiltrating our borders.
Without these defense radars, low flying aircraft will go undetected.
It will be open season for any drug/gun/slave smugglers, terrorists flying in with nukes, low altitude missiles, or even a full scale low elevation invasion/attack against America.”
With China actively and openly deploying Russian-made low altitude strategic bombers, designing EMP weapons capable of disabling the country’s power grid infrastructure, and establishing economic zones within the United States, it’s difficult to imagine the motivation behind the move to further weaken U.S. air defenses on the southern border.
If September 11, 2001 was any indication of our air defense capabilities, and considering that any ground invasion of the United States would originate on our southern border, then wouldn’t we want as many early warning systems as possible to be actively protecting our country in these specific areas?
The U.S. government has chosen to shutdown this outward facing surveillance system, and has instead turned the surveillance inward, on the American people.
This article is brought to you courtesy of Mac Slavo.

Read more at http://marketdailynews.com/2013/01/23/barack-obama-to-shut-down-southern-air-defense-systems/#ay0uVvDhO3G77aTt.99

Aerostate Ballons on Border 8/22/2012...[Looking for an update in 2013]

Aerostats On Mexico Border: U.S. Testing Surveillance Balloons After Success In Iraq And Afghanistan
AP | By Posted: Updated: 08/23/2012 8:45 am
In Iraq or Afghanistan, where the technology has already proven effective at spotting attackers, such balloons provide surveillance around bases. U.S. officials think they could be equally helpful in tracking drug smugglers and illegal immigrants along a rugged stretch of the Rio Grande that doesn't have any segments of border fence.
The Border Patrol is testing two blimp-shaped, helium-filled balloons, which are on loan from the Defense Department. Congressional staff members joined Homeland Security and Defense Department officials Wednesday near the border town of Roma, about 260 miles (400 kilometers) south of San Antonio, to see what the aerostats can do. Members of the media were given a more limited glimpse of the devices' capabilities.
The two aerostats — one about 55 feet (17 meters) long, the other 72 feet (22 meters) — being tested along the border are made in North Carolina by TCOM, a company with its headquarters in Maryland.
At the altitude displayed Wednesday, the white, 72-foot (22-meter) -long balloon is small but visible. Near where it's tethered, operators inside a windowless shipping container outfitted with air conditioning and three banks of video monitors scan the area, zoom in on vehicles a couple of miles away, switch to infrared and quickly pick up a vehicle moving through a parking lot.
The balloons' cameras can easily reach across the river to Mexico, but Border Patrol spokesman Henry Mendiola said that isn't the intent.
"Especially in this area upriver from La Joya where we have no infrastructure, we have no technology, everything down here is still being done by boots on the ground, and so this type of technology would make our job a little more efficient," he said.
 
The 72-foot (22-meter) model can stay airborne for at least 14 days. While the aerostats can't cover nearly the range of a helicopter or drone, they are far less expensive to operate and can be moved if needed.
Since the testing began Aug. 10, the balloons have already assisted agents patrolling the area. "We have seen some successes off of the aerostat in the testing phase," Mendiola said, declining to give details.
On the border, agents already employ an arsenal of surveillance tools that includes airplanes, helicopters, drones, boats, ground-based sensors and agents equipped with night-vision goggles.
Last year, the U.S. government dumped SBInet, a yearslong attempt to build a "virtual fence" along the border that cost nearly $1 billion. The aerostats, however, as well as an 80-foot (25-meter) tower with similar surveillance capabilities also being tested at the border, reflect an attempt to make use of the vast inventory of equipment that's been used in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The Border Patrol tested a similar balloon-mounted surveillance system in Arizona in March, and a variety of other Defense Department devices are also expected to be tested at the border in coming months.

Tachtical Security contact to Homeland Security 6/82012

Harris Corp. Awarded DHS Tactical Communications Procurement Contract
By: Homeland Security Today Staff
06/08/2012 ( 9:51am)
Bookmark and Share
Harris Corp., an international communications and information technology company, has been awarded a five-year, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract to provide commercial off-the-shelf equipment and services to support tactical communications for the Department of Homeland Security and its partner agencies.
Harris was one of 22 large companies selected for this contract, which has a $3 billion ceiling. Harris was one of five vendors selected to participate in all five technical categories offered, including but not limited to, mobile radios, control/base stations, software, routers, repeaters and test equipment. The contract also encompasses engineering, design, installation and maintenance services. In addition to DHS, the contract will be available to the Departments of State, Justice and Interior, and the White House Communications Agency.
Source: Harris Corp.

Harris Corp: Tactical Communication for Brazilian Border Security, May 7 2013

Harris Corporation Selected by SAVIS to Provide Tactical Area Communications System to Brazilian Border Security Program

Highlights:

  • Providing Brazilian Army with end-to-end tactical communications capabilities.
  • Falcon III® tactical communication system will be integrated into largest border security initiative.
  • Broadens Harris' international leadership in tactical wideband communications.
MELBOURNE, FL/ROCHESTER, NY, May 7, 2013 — Harris Corporation (NYSE:HRS), an international communications and information technology company, was selected by SAVIS Tecnologia e Sistemas S/A to provide an end-to-end tactical communications system for SISFRON, which is the largest border security program in Latin America. Harris will work with Savis Tecnologia e Sistemas S/A, an Embraer Defesa & Segurança subsidiary, to provide border security personnel with tactical voice, situational awareness and surveillance capabilities from Harris wideband radios. These radios deliver live video, tactical chat, and situational awareness to the lowest echelons. Savis is the prime contractor on the SISFRON program.Harris will supply tactical communications subsystems, accessories, software, services and support for the pilot phase of SISFRON (Sistema Integrado de Monitoramento de Fronteiras), the integrated border monitoring system the Brazilian Army is developing across the western borders of Brazil. This initial phase of SISFRON will provide surveillance and protection across approximately 650 kilometers of Brazilian border territory. SISFRON intends to cover the entire interior border of Brazil, which is more than 16,000 kilometers of territory that divides 11 Brazilian states and 10 neighboring countries. The Harris tactical communications system consists of radios and accessories from across the entire Harris Falcon III® 7800 tactical radio family — including High-Frequency, Very-High-Frequency, Multiband, Soldier Personal Radio and High-Capacity Line-of-Sight radios. Harris tactical communications systems will be installed in vehicles, shelters and operations centers. "Harris solutions will enable secure real-time voice, situational awareness and video communications across all echelons and provide border security forces with unprecedented command and control capability," said Dana Mehnert, group president, Harris RF Communications. "This important program significantly expands our presence with the Brazilian Army in support of their communications modernization requirements."Harris RF Communications is the leading global supplier of secure radio communications and embedded high-grade encryption solutions for military, government and commercial organizations. The company's Falcon® family of software-defined tactical radio systems encompasses manpack, handheld and vehicular applications. Falcon III is the next generation of radios supporting the U.S. military's Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) requirements, as well as network-centric operations worldwide. Harris RF Communications is also a leading supplier of assured communications® systems and equipment for public safety, utility and transportation markets — with products ranging from the most advanced IP voice and data networks to portable and mobile single- and multiband radios.About Harris Corporation
Harris is an international communications and information technology company serving government and commercial markets in more than 125 countries. Headquartered in Melbourne, Florida, the company has approximately $5.5 billion of annual revenue and about 15,000 employees — including 6,000 engineers and scientists. Harris is dedicated to developing best-in-class assured communications® products, systems, and services. Additional information about Harris Corporation is available at harris.com.
# # #Contact Information:Ben Rand
RF Communications
ben.rand@harris.com
585-241-8187Jim Burke
Harris Corporation
jim.burke@harris.com
321-727-9131

Harris Corporation has new technology for border security (also in Middle East) May 11 2013

Border Security Systems

This integrated system provides users with a common operational picture and automatic patrol dispatch for quicker more informed decisions.


Harris can leverage its expertise and extensive portfolio of products and systems to modify the packaged system solutions to meet your unique needs.

For more information, contact us at rfcomm@harris.com or call us at 1-888-711-7295. International callers: +001 321-674-4253 or +001 321-727-9207.

Border technology after Rob Krentz murder - Information Technology "Homeland Sec. Today"

By: Mickey McCarter

04/29/13

Three years ago, Rep. Ron Barber (D-Ariz.) and former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) visited the outskirts of Arizona's border with Mexico on a fact-finding mission in the wake of the murder of a rancher there.

While talking to ranchers along the Southwest border after the death of Robert Krentz, the lawmakers found that communications often could be extremely unreliable. When trying to contact the secretary of homeland security, their signal would often drop.

The problem underscores communication challenges facing law enforcement personnel at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Barber noted in a hearing Friday. Those communications problems persist three years later.

The topic of communications capability and interoperability was a recurring area of discussion at the hearing, dedicated to wasteful duplicity and fragmentation among DHS programs.

Much duplication and fragmentation at DHS comes from a lack of centralized governance, experts told the House Homeland Security oversight subcommittee. The same problem has slowed DHS progress toward radio interoperability, Anne Richards, an assistant DHS inspector general (IG), testified.

In a report released in November 2012, the DHS IG surveyed DHS radio users and found that only one out of 479 surveyed could access and communicate on a designated common channel for the department. Only 20 percent of radios tested by the IG office were programmed to reach the common channel, Richards said.

Despite an internal goal of radio interoperability among DHS personnel, the department was not reaching its goal because of weak governance for the goal. The IG report at the time recommended DHS centralize authority for achieving interoperability.

But DHS responded that a joint working group, coordinated through memoranda of understanding (MOUs) between DHS components, would effectively provide governance to achieve interoperability.

So the recommendation remains open, Richards said. In total, the DHS IG office has made 8,000 recommendations in the past ten years, with about 15 percent of them remaining open. That 15 percent scales to $650 million program values, economically speaking, she added.

Meanwhile, departmentwide interoperability lags at DHS because radios are not programmed to the common channel and radio operators are unaware of its existence. DHS was working on guidance on the issue, as recommended by the IG office, but rejected centralized governance of the issue. DHS has the authority to strengthen management of the issue, but chooses to work through the MOUs.

"My audit work indicates that collaboration is not at the point where it is going to get them there quickly," Richards said.

The IG office also is examining radio inventory issues at the department, and a draft report is in the works. Richards predicted the IG office would release it within the next quarter.

With that audit, the IG office may reach similar conclusions as it did with a recent audit of DHS detection equipment, Richards' testimony suggested. In that audit, the IG office found that various DHS components did not identify detection equipment such as metal detectors in a common way.

"They had it on their inventories but they all recorded it differently," Richards said. As such, DHS agencies did not have information readily available to assist it in sharing or shifting resources.

The IG office prescribed standard data dictionaries to enable components to define specific equipment with common terms. With those standards, DHS could share information on its radios and perhaps speed its goal of achieving departmentwide interoperability as well as becoming "One DHS," Richards said.

Cathleen Berrick, managing director of homeland security at the Government Accountability Office (GAO), noted generally DHS IT management continues to face high risk, despite a recent high-level review of major IT programs. That review only accounts for about 20 percent of the IT portfolio throughout the department, Berrick said.

Any DHS management challenge requires a roadmap of the root causes of fundamental management problems, Berrick said. From there, DHS must identify gaps and dedicate resources to address those gaps. If faced with limited funding, DHS must prioritize its initiatives.

Moreover, a system of metrics and oversight structure can demonstrate progress in addressing issues, Berrick said. DHS must have sustainable, repeatable plans for tackling management challenges.

DHS has a good strategy and strong metrics for many of these challenges and must now carry out that strategy to fruition, Berrick said.

Henry Willis, director of the Rand Homeland Security and Defense Center, suggested Congress could provide more oversight over some DHS programs by demanding to review analyses of major decisions.

And lawmakers should continue to ensure adequate and sustained funding for analytic capabilities, Willis said, quoting the maxim, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."

Pres. Obama/guns in Mexico American Thinker: May 4, 2013

May 4, 2013

How can President Obama speak about guns in Mexico with a straight face?

Silvio Canto, Jr.


President Obama's Mexico trip has just taken a turn for the bizarre.This is what President Obama told Mexicans:

"...I will continue to do everything in my power to pass common-sense reforms that keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people. That can save lives here in Mexico and back home in the United States. It's the right thing to do,...." (RCP)

First, the Obama administration put 2,000 high powered weapons in the hands of Mexican cartels. Did President Obama forget about that little tragic episode from his first term? We hear that 200-plus Mexicans were killed by these weapons. Why didn't President Obama apologize to the soldiers' families? Or the widows? Or the orphans?


Second, cartel leaders, or criminals in the US, will continue to have guns because outlaws always do. Can someone remind President Obama of what is happening in Chicago? President Obama's hometown has very strict gun laws but Juarez is Disneyland compared to the killings in Chicago!


Third, all of these guns are already outlawed in Mexico and in the US.


How do you say "The Twilight Zone" in Spanish? I think that it's "La dimension desconocidad," i.e. the unknown dimension literally.
There is a "gun problem' and lots of cartel violence in Mexico. However, it is one of those "perfect storm" problems that won't get fixed with a "hope and change" speech before university students.

Indeed, many guns come from the US. They also come in from Central America.They come in because very "liquid" cartels buy weapons in a very big international gun black market.They come in because of corruption in Mexico. They come in because Mexico does not do a better job of protecting the southbound traffic on the border.

And 2,000 high powered weapons came in because of "Fast & Furious."

Honestly, there is one thing that we could do to curtail the cartel violence in Mexico: Stop consuming so many illegal drugs! We are putting billions of dollars in the pockets of cartels by consuming these drugs.

The cartels will always have guns as long as we keep filling their pockets with cash.





Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/05/how_can_president_obama_speak_about_guns_in_mexico_with_a_straight_face.html#ixzz2Syykjbg8
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Center For Immigration Reform: V Visa: Very Many More Admitted Very Quickly

V Visa: Very Many More Admitted Very Quickly

In addition to the instant amnesty for 11 million illegal aliens and their families and huge new guestworker programs, the Schumer-Rubio bill will change the rules to allow more than 1.4 million family visa applicants to bypass the current waiting list and be admitted immediately and begin working, even before they are approved for a green card. This little-noticed re-write of the V visa rules will also admit another 2.9 million immigrant visa hopefuls to enter the country as temporary visitors. Far from a gradual "backlog" clearing exercise, these changes will bring in large numbers of new job-seekers to compete with American citizens, established legal residents, new guestworkers, and the newly legalized.
The change is found in Section 2308 of the bill, on "V Non-immigrant Visas". The V visa was originally created to allow the admission of eligible spouses and children of green card holders (a.k.a. legal permanent residents or LPRs) who had been waiting at least three years for their number to come up.
The Schumer-Rubio bill scraps the old V visa criteria and replaces them to benefit an entirely new group. First, the original V visa beneficiaries, who numbered about 220,000 at last count, will be admitted immediately off the waiting list, on par with the spouses and children of U.S. citizens, and without numerical limitations.
The new V-1 visas will be offered to three categories of family visa applicants. All of these are currently subject to numerical limits, but the limits and waiting list become irrelevant when they are admitted on the V-1 visa. The beneficiaries are:
  1. Unmarried sons and daughters of citizens;
  2. Unmarried sons and daughters of LPRs;
  3. Married sons and daughters of citizens, under 31.
These applicants are entitled to work permits upon admission. They will be processed similarly to immigrant visa applicants, with pro forma fingerprint and medical screenings.
Based on the State Department's annual count, as of November 1, 2012, I estimate that there were about 1,190,755 people in these three categories. (We have exact counts for categories (1) and (2), but not for (3). For that category, I simply apportioned one-half the actual count to the over-31 group and one-half to the under-31 group, because the State Department's count does not show ages.)
The new V-2 visas will be offered to two categories:
  1. Married sons and daughters of citizens, over 31;
  2. Siblings of U.S. citizens.
Related Topics:

The V-2 applicants cannot receive a work permit, but are authorized to stay up to 60 days each year. However, because there is virtually no visa compliance enforcement, we can expect that many will not return home — why should they? After all, they have already discovered that following the rules is not rewarded (many have been on the waiting list for several years) and overstaying is a better deal.
Using the State Department's count, I estimate there are 2,888,567 in the V-2 category.
Under longstanding policy, those applicants who are waiting in line for an immigrant visa cannot easily qualify for a non-immigrant visa, because they are at high risk for overstay. This bill entirely abandons the idea of an immigrant visa waiting list and controlled rates of admission within limits, and simply admits everyone at will on the fig leaf of a “non-immigrant” visa.
These changes would go into effect on October 1 following enactment of the bill. So potentially as early as October of this year, 1.4 million people could become eligible to be admitted as V-1s on the path to a green card, and another 2.9 million could become eligible

Border Patrol: Rules Hinder Efforts to oust drug spotters Washington Post May 7 2013

For years, cartels have stationed spotters on U.S. territory to help track American border efforts and to guide smugglers around roadblocks and past where agents are stationed. But in recent months, those spotters have gotten more attention as Congress prepares to debate an immigration legalization bill.


“Why don’t we take those people out?” said Sen. Ron Johnson, Wisconsin Republican.
Sen. Thomas R. Carper, Delaware Democrat, who chairs the SenateHomeland Security Committee, said he was shocked to learn of the spotters during a trip to the border earlier this year, saying that if U.S. troops had come across spotter locations in Iraq or Afghanistan, those sites would have been taken out.
Border Patrol Chief Michael J. Fisher said there’s a major difference between those war zones and the U.S.-Mexico border, where agents have to obey strict rules of engagement.
“The rules of engagement, what we call our ‘use of force,’ applies to individuals on the street or whether they’re up on a mountaintop,” he told the Senate panel.
Chief Fisher said the agency had had some success in ousting “dozens” of spotters from mountaintops, but he couldn’t say how many more locations remains.
The mountaintop spotters have been a thorny problem for years.


Two years ago, Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano engaged in a heated exchange over how many spotters there were. Mr. McCain said he had been told there were hundreds, while Ms. Napolitano replied that there were hundreds of peaks that could be used, but there weren’t hundreds of actual spotters.
“Look, they are there, and everyone knows they’re there, and for you and your staff to deny that they’re there is sort of symptomatic to me,” Mr. McCain said.
The Washington Times has visited well-camouflaged spotter locations in the Sonoran Desert National Monument 75 miles north of the border, with a view of Interstate 8, which runs from just south of Phoenix west to San Diego.
Officials told The Times that every potential smuggling corridor in Arizona is monitored by mountaintop spotters, who are usually low-level cartel employees or those who owe a debt to the cartel.
They are armed with radios and cellphones and occasionally with weapons, and are sometimes held responsible if the drug loads they are spotting for are interdicted by authorities.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/7/border-patrol-rules-hinder-effort-oust-drug-spotte/#ixzz2SyuuY7h4
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

May 7 2013..Immigration Reform Bill...and Border Security

Immigration Reform Bill Becoming Focal Point for Border Security Battles
By: Mickey McCarter
05/07/2013 ( 8:00am)
Bookmark and Share
Congress will debate several aspects of border security policy this week as Senate committees turn their attention to the bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform bill introduced on April 17.

While the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will examine border security measures implicit in the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013 (S. 744), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee plans to block any measures imposing new border security fees.

Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) has scheduled a hearing of his committee Tuesday to hear how the bill would affect border security operations from officials at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), including Kevin McAleenan, acting deputy commissioner of US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Michael Fisher, chief of US Border Patrol. Other witnesses at the hearing include David Heyman, DHS assistant secretary for policy, Anne Richards, DHS assistant inspector general, and Daniel Ragsdale, deputy director of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a chief sponsor of the immigration reform bill, welcomed news of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee's hearing on it.

"I am encouraged that the homeland security committee, which oversees the federal department and agencies tasked with securing our border and enforcing our immigration laws, will examine the immigration legislation," Rubio said after announcement of the hearing on May 2. "We need more transparency and greater scrutiny of this bill, and it's important for this committee to further help us identify ways we can secure our borders, strengthen interior enforcement and end today's de facto amnesty of having 11 million illegal immigrants living here in violation of our laws. This kind of discussion and debate is essential for America's security and for fixing our immigration system."

The other seven sponsors of the Senate immigration reform bill include John McCain (R-Ariz.), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Michael Bennet (D-Colo.). Of the "Gang of Eight" sponsors, only McCain is a member of the homeland security committee.

The Senate Judiciary Committee meanwhile is scheduled to hold a hearing to markup the comprehensive immigration reform bill on Thursday.

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) announced Monday his intention to use the bill as a vehicle to stop DHS from imposing any new border crossing fees.

At issue is a separate proposal contained in the White House budget proposal for DHS in fiscal year 2014. That proposal would direct CBP to study the feasibility of imposing a border crossing fee to all visitors of the United States who cross land borders.

The exact language of the bill reads:

The commissioner of Customs and Border Protection shall: (1) conduct a study assessing the feasibility and cost relating to establishing and collecting a land border crossing fee for both land border pedestrians and passenger vehicles along the Northern and Southwest borders of the United States; the study should include (a) the feasibility of collecting from existing operators on the land border such as bridge commissions, toll operators, commercial passenger bus, and commercial passenger rail; (b) requirements to collect at land ports of entry where existing capability is not present; and (c) any legal and regulatory impediments to establishing and collecting a land border crossing fee; and (2) complete the study within nine months of enactment of this act.

Leahy filed an amendment to the comprehensive immigration reform bill to block such a fee from ever being collected.

"It does not take a study to know that charging Canadian relatives, friends, tourists, business people and shoppers a fee to enter the United States is a bad idea. I do not intend to let this half-baked idea see the light of day," Leahy said in a statement.

The border-crossing fee "would deflate thriving commerce" key to border communities along the Northern border, Leahy said. The bill would be particularly harmful to Vermont. About 300,000 Canadians visit the United States every day and spend about $235 million here. In 2006, Canadians visited Vermont specifically 642,400 times and spent $115 million in the state, according to Leahy.

"Here in Vermont our economic prosperity is interwoven with Quebec's prosperity," Leahy said. "The Burlington International Airport depends on Quebec for nearly one-third of its passengers. Resorts like Jay Peak draw thousands of people south to Vermont every day, contributing to our local economy. And there are dozens of businesses producing goods -- from IBM's semiconductors, to Barry Callebaut's chocolates -- that depend on a free and open border to create jobs here in Vermont and in Quebec. That's not theory; it's a practical, daily fact of life in our state, and it's worth keeping and defending. A new fee on these activities would threaten the core of our economy."

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) joined Leahy in writing a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano urging DHS to drop the proposal to study the border-crossing fee.

Friday, May 10, 2013

2012: Ruidoso Downs Race Track, NM - FBI raid on alleged Cartel owners of prize hores

Feds raid Ruidoso Downs; horses were alleged Zetas front

FBI says 7 of 14 suspects in custody; NM track part of three-state search

Click photo to enlarge
Unidentified law enforcement personnel take a horse away from the... (Mike Curran/Ruidoso News)
›› Archive photos: Alleged Zeta leader's horse wins 2010 All American Futurity
›› Read indictment of alleged Zetas leader Miguel Ángel Treviño Morales The notorious Los Zetas drug cartel of Mexico has infected American quarter-horse racing -- including at Ruidoso Downs Racetrack and Casino, federal officials charge in an indictment. On Tuesday morning, the FBI arrested seven people in connection with an alleged scheme to launder millions of dollars by purchasing and racing horses that have won some of the country's most prestigious quarter-horse races in recent years. Miguel Angel Trevino Morales, 38, a "co-leader" of the brutal Los Zetas cartel known as "40," and his brother, Oscar Omar Trevino Morales, 36, known as "42," were indicted in the case, but are are believed to be in Mexico, federal authorities said. Agents executed search warrants in three states, including one at the Ruidoso track. Also among the indicted, but not arrested, is Raul Ramirez, 20, of El Paso, according to a statement from U.S. Attorney Robert Pitman of San Antonio. Ramirez is accused of bidding on horses for the Trevino brothers. Fernando Solis Garcia, 29, was arrested in Ruidoso. He is accused of buying horses for the criminal organization through straw purchasers and helping to train animals. A federal grand jury on May 30 indicted 14 people in connection with the scheme, according to Pitman and other federal authorities. A third Trevino brother, Jose Trevino Morales, 45, and his wife, Zulema Trevino, 38, were arrested Tuesday in Lexington, Okla. They are accused of operating Zule Farms, where Jose Trevino was "actively involved in managing the activities of money-laundering operation in the United States while posing as a 'legitimate' quarter-horse owner," the indictment says. Carlos Miguel Nayen Borbolla, 26; Adan Farias, 32; and Felipe Alejandro Quintero, 28; were arrested in Los Angeles. Eusevio Maldonado Huitron, 48, was arrested in Austin. Also indicted but still at large are Francisco Antonio Colorado Cessa, 51, of Veracruz, Mexico; Victor Manuel Lopez, 31, of Nuevo Laredo, Mexico; Sergio Rogelio Guerrero Rincon, 40, of Mexico; and Luis Gerardo Aguirre, 35, of Mexico. The defendants are charged with one count each of conspiracy
FBI agents this morning served a federal search warrant at Ruidoso Downs Race Track & Casino, a horse racing track in southern New Mexico, according to an agency spokesman in Albuquerque. (Rudy Gutierrez / El Paso Times)
to launder monetary instruments. Federal authorities are demanding that the Trevino brothers forfeit five quarter horses, including Mr. Piloto, winner of the 2010 All American Futurity Race at Ruidoso Downs. The race is regarded as one of the most prestigious events in quarter-horse racing and paid $1 million to the winner. Authorities are also seeking to force the defendants to forfeit $20 million -- the amount federal prosecutors say was used in the horse-buying scheme. Millions of dollars were run through front companies to conduct transactions in Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma and California, the indictment says. Among the purchases made, according to the indictment, were 13 horses in September 2009 for $546,000; 23 horses in September 2010 in Ruidoso for $2.2 million; five horses in California for $442,000; and 12 horses in January 2011 for $546, 200. The indictment says that organization bought the horses from itself at inflated prices using shell companies. Among the sales the group is alleged to have made were the sale of a horse named Blues Girls Choice for $102,000; Devil Ridge for $100,000; Number One Cartel for $280,000; and Forty Force for $40,000. "The allegations in this indictment, if proven, would document yet another example of the corrupting influence of Mexican drug cartels within the United States, facilitated by the enormous profits generated by the illicit drug trade," Pitman said in a statement. The target of the search in Ruidoso was Tremor Enterprises, a horse-breeding operation allegedly owned and operated by Jose and Zulema Trevino, according to the federal indictment. The New York Times broke the story of the arrests, indictments and searches on Tuesday morning. The indictment states that Miguel Angel Trevino became one of two leaders of the cartel through a brutal process of elimination. The defendants are accused of using "bulk currency, wire transfers, bulk currency deposits and structured payments from Mexico into the United States" to buy horses. Fred Burton, vice president of intelligence for global intelligence firm Stratfor, said horse racing is an excellent fit for an organized-crime group trying to launder illicit earnings. "If you have that kind of disposable income and start looking at industries where you can also make money, it makes perfect sense if you think about it," he said. "It's not unlike the Jewish and Italian mafias that moved to Las Vegas." Vince Mares, executive director of the New Mexico Racing Commission, said his agency has been assisting the FBI in its Zetas inquiry for approximately eight months. "We have been involved and helping the FBI, I want to say, since October of last year," he said. Mares said the racing commission supplied records relating to licensees and races to federal investigators. He said the commission had known for a few days that a break in the case was coming. Mares traveled from Albuquerque to Ruidoso on Tuesday because of the federal investigation. Bred to sprint short distances, quarter horses race primarily in the Southwest and California. The federal investigation of drug money in quarter-horse racing is the second black eye this year for horse racing in the United States. Earlier this year, the New York Times reported on doping of all types of race horses that resulted in deaths and injuries to jockeys and horses. New Mexico particularly was plagued by problems, the paper reported. Marty Schladen may be reached at mschladen@elpasotimes.com; 546-6127. Times reporters Felix Chavez, Alejandro Martinez Cabrera, Daniel Borunda and Adriana Chavez and Chuck Slothower of The Daily Times in Farmington contributed to this story.

Immigration Bill Adopted in Committee: from Senator Flake Ariz. Senator May 9 2013 release

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5107/5789846903_272868e5e3_z.jpg
Senator Jeff Flake
News Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Thursday, May 9, 2013


Washington, D.C. – United States Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ), today offered two amendments during the Senate Committee on the Judiciary markup of S. 744, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act. The amendments were adopted en bloc.

Flake #1:Adds three private land owner representatives (one from the Northern border region and two from the Southern border region) to the Department of Homeland Security Border Oversight Task Force included in the bill.

Flake #2:Revises the schedule for the Department of Homeland Security’s submittal of the semiannual status report regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Southern Border Security Strategy to 180 days after submission and every 180 days thereafter. Additionally, it adds the Comptroller of the United States as a recipient of the status report, and adds a requirement for an annual review by the Comptroller of the reports and an assessment of the status and progress of the strategy.

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Rob Krentz heritage rancher(deceased), Douglas, Arizona: Full story published in Farmer and Rancher Newspaper, Florida May 2013

See the story published in Farmer and Rancher Newspaper, statewide newspaper directed at Ag and Ranchers in Florida.

Forwarded: Lawmakers Told Constitution Requires Secure Border (Bob Unruh) WND Reportl

An organization that made a name for itself fighting China’s plan to take over American ports now is urging states to demand that Washington obey the U.S. Constitution and secure the borders.
Jonathon Moseley, executive director of American Border Control, told WND his group has been sending letters to members of the legislatures in border states such as Texas and Arizona.
The letters point out that the Constitution requires the federal government to secure the borders if state legislatures or governors ask.
The group cites Section 4, Article 4 of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
American Border Control is asking legislatures of states along the Mexican border “to formally demand that the United States government immediately secure” the border.
ABC argues the constitutional is “unconditional,” “objective, not subjective,” “does not allow any decision by Washington” and “does not empower the U.S. government.”
“Thus, it is a constitutional command that the United State government ‘shall’ protect the border states against (a) invasion and (b) domestic violence related to a failure to secure the border,” ABC’s request to states explains.
“Border incursions by violent drug smugglers and other criminals form the primary basis for this constitutional demand. To protect against these criminals, the U.S. government is constitutionally required to secure the state’s borders (for all purposes).”
The request notes that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that states gave up many of their rights to pass laws controlling incursions when they joined the union. Furthermore, President Obama has exercised absolute control in that regard, bringing a lawsuit against Arizona for its law allowing state law enforcement officers to enforce federal immigration laws.
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has charged Obama “is waging war on Arizona over illegal immigration.”
His comment came in response to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano’s decision to suspend for Arizona “the 287(g) program.” The program is named for a provision of federal law used by DHS to deputize local, county and state law enforcement officers to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration laws.
“Evidently Obama didn’t get everything they wanted from the Supreme Court, so they decided to retaliate against Arizona,” Arpaio said.
The administration decision was announced after the Supreme Court decision on Arizona’s State Bill 1070, which would have enforced federal anti-incursion laws.
The high court decided the state has the right to ask whether suspects are in the United States legally but cannot provide a punishment for having an illegal status.
“What the Obama administration wants is amnesty,” Arpaio said at the time. “DHS has made it clear the goal is to allow people here illegally to hit the streets.”
The new campaign said that’s just fine.
“Article 4, Section 4 was a corresponding guarantee that the U.S. government would take over that responsibility. As a condition of Arizona giving up the power that the U.S. Supreme Court says has been ceded to the federal government, Arizona received in return an absolute, unconditional guarantee of protection from the federal government. Therefore, Arizona does have the power under our U.S. Constitution to force action by Washington to secure Arizona’s border with Mexico to the same extent that Arizona handed over such power to the federal government,” the ABC campaign explains.
“‘Invasion’ does not necessarily have to be large,” the group says. ‘In 1789, a typical military action could be a small cross-border raiding party. A state of war might involve months of inactivity in between small battles. Violent incidents across the Mexican border demonstrate a pattern of violence with systematic coordination, comprising invasion.”
ABC says it might be “an impeachable offense for the commander in chief to disobey this clear and unequivocal command of the U.S. Constitution.”
In the letters to lawmakers, ABC says: “Border incursions by violent drug smugglers and other criminals is the primary issue here. To protect against these criminals, the U.S. government is constitutionally required to secure Arizona’s borders (for all purposes).”
Lawmakers are told: “You would of course have to document a compelling need in factual terms. Incidents of actual violence, gang activity, and threats within Arizona resulting from a lack of border security would be the basis of this constitutional demand. Well-known
examples and incidents suffered by Arizona citizens and law enforcement would be the
core of such a resolution.”
Moseley wrote, “I believe that the legislature would easily be able to itemize something like a ‘Bill of Particulars’ chronicling many examples and patterns of such real-world effects on life in Arizona against which the U.S. government is failing to protect your state.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/lawmakers-told-constitution-requires-secure-border/#CaZUkj5y6QCcgxq8.99

Forwarded: South Texas Ranchers tell Sen. Cornyn border is not secure (Action 4 News Nadia Galindo) Rio Grande Valley

Senator John Cornyn visited Brooks County today to hear issues ranchers and authorities in the area are facing with the influx of immigrants making their way 60 miles north of the border.

“We’ve rescued them, they are on the verge of dying out here and we’ve rescued hundreds of them,” rancher Dr. Mike Vickers said.

Mike and his wife Linda Vickers live minutes from the Falfurrias checkpoint, making their land a popular crossing for illegal immigrants.

“We’re running about a hundred a month and this is just a little quarter mile of fence line,” Linda said.

The couple finds clothing, trash, water jugs and evidence of human smugglers are on their property daily.

“Some of the ranchers in this county have been threatened, don’t call the Border Patrol, if you see people on your property,” Mike said.

Smugglers also destroy fencing and water pumps costing the Vickers thousands of dollars each year.

Senator Cornyn heard the concerns of the Vickers and several other ranchers today at a meeting with Brooks County elected officials and the South Texans’ Property Rights Association.

County officials told Senator Cornyn they need money and resources to control what some call an invasion of illegal immigrants and drug trafficking.

“The threat of danger is imminent to everybody in this county because of what is happening here, this is gang related,” Mike said.

Brooks County Sheriff Department rescued 659 illegal immigrants, who were abandoned by smugglers on private property last year and found about 129 bodies.

With the numbers of illegal immigrants increasing, the rural county is struggling to pay for equipment and needs money to hire additional law enforcement.

Many ranchers said the solution to the problem is to tighten security on the border, adding more border patrol agents.

Sen. Cornyn mentioned a workers permit program which would allow immigrants to work legally in the country, which he said would prevent immigrants from ending up in the hands of smugglers.

The Vickers like many of the ranchers at the meeting insist a solution is needed now.

Sunday, May 5, 2013

Forwarded email: Name withheld...."ABC News story"

Former South Carolina Republican senator and current Heritage Foundation president Jim DeMint argued that implementing immigration reform as proposed by the so-called "Gang of Eight" would "cost Americans trillions of dollars," citing a soon-to-be released update to the conservative group's 2007 study on the impact of immigration reform.
"The study you'll see from Heritage this week presents a staggering cost of another amnesty in our country," DeMint said this morning on "This Week," based on the "detrimental effects long-term" of government benefits that would eventually go to the millions offered a path to citizenship under the reform legislation currently being considered. "There's no reason we can't begin to fix our immigration system so that we won't make this problem worse. But the bill that's being presented is unfair to those who came here legally. It will cost Americans trillions of dollars. It'll make our unlawful immigration system worse."
A 2007 study by Robert Rector, assuming all undocumented immigrants were granted "amnesty," said the cost to the United States of immigration reform would be at least $2.6 trillion. When asked if the new Heritage estimate would be more than $2.5 trillion, DeMint responded "much more than that."
abc jim demint this week jt 130505 wblog Jim DeMint: Immigration Reform Will Cost U.S. Trillions
The 2007 study is not without its critics, such as Alex Nowrasteh of the Cato Institute, who wrote in April that the study's "flawed methodology produced a grossly exaggerated cost to federal taxpayers of legalizing unauthorized immigrants while undercounting or discounting their positive tax and economic contributions."
DeMint dismissed the criticisms, including estimates by the Congressional Budget Office that say immigration reform will increase economic growth.
"Well, CBO said Obamacare wouldn't cost us anything. They're basically puppets of the Congress and the assumptions they put in the bill. Heritage is only organization that has done an analysis on the cost," DeMint said.
"If you consider all the factors related to the amnesty - and, believe me, this is comprehensive - that it will have a negative long-term impact on our gross domestic product," DeMint added. "So we just want Congress, for once, to count the cost of a bill. They're notorious for underestimating the cost and not understanding the consequences."

May 2013...from a border rancher who chooses to remain anonymous

I was visiting with hotel owners along the border ...many say bus tours have declined because the border is unsafe.. some say its really been bad for the hotels according to the news the border crossers are moving east  to Texas.  Just goes to show how the impact of murder stories  do hurt the local community...and businesses...and for us it is more expensive to ranch because of the illegals...and the illegals do damage the overall value of the ranch because of the border..just another point